-completed KWL chart with little detail

-did not include ideas from other team

-shows little or no new ideas learned

-untidy, contains many spelling error

-completed KWL chart

with some detail

-includes few ideas from other team

-shows some detail of what you have learned

-completed KWL chart in detail

-includes many ideas from other team

-shows in detail what you have learned

-tidy with minimal spelling errors

-shows fewer than 5 relationships between humans and water

-disorganized, hard to understand

-shows between 5- 9 relationships between humans and water

-somewhat organized, parts difficult to understand

-shows 10 or more relationships between humans and water

-organized so it looks good and is easy to understand

-audience showed lack of interest

-lacked facts and details

-lacked organization and logical flow

-presentation contained factual errors

-difficult to hear, mumbled

-little eye contact

-unequal oral participation

-dependent on notes

-did not maintain audience attention

-persuaded audience with some facts and details

-showed some organization and logical flow

-contained some factual errors

-inconsistent voice control

-some eye contact

-somewhat dependent on notes

-grabbed attention of audience

-persuaded audience with facts and details

-showed organization and logical flow

-contained no factual errors

-clear, loud voice

-good eye contact

-both partners participated

-not dependent on notes

-answered any questions knowledgeably

-followed few directions given

-did not complete task on time

-needed constant teacher prompting

-worked cooperatively little of the time

-demonstrated poor listening skills

-unequal distribution of work

-followed most directions given

-occasionally needed teacher prompting

-worked cooperatively most of the time

-followed all directions given

-completed task on time

-showed self-motivation

-worked cooperatively all of the time

-showed good listening skills