School Zoo Project

Zelda's Zany Zoo

Evaluation

Use these questions to make sure you have a complete, well done project:

Do you have all parts of the project completed: habitat model, tour guide script and fact list, educational sign?

Is your presentation convincing as to why your habitat should be the one to build?

Did you explain why you designed your animal habitat the way that you did?

Did you work cooperatively with the other members of your team? Did all members of the team contribute equally?

Is your animal display attractive as well as informative? Does the animal appear to be in a natural setting?

Reflection

What was the one thing during this activity that you think that you will remember six months from now?

If you could change one thing about how you participated in this assignment, what would it be?

What are you most proud of in this project?

How did you organize information as you researched? Was this effective? What could you do differently next time to make it more effective?

Self Evaluation	PROFICIENT 4	CONSOLIDATING 3	DEVELOPING 2	BEGINNING 1
ORGANIZATION	Presentation well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; Flowed smoothly from one idea to another. Written notes show evidence that process steps were followed when developing report.	Presented in thoughtful manner; signs of organization. Written notes show beginnings of accuracy and organization.	Somewhat organized; ideas not presented coherently. Written notes are sketchy.	Choppy and confusing; format difficult to follow No evidence of written notes.
CONTENT ACCURACY	Completely accurate; all facts were precise and explicit.	Mostly accurate, a few inconsistencies	Somewhat accurate; more than a few inconsistencies or errors in information	Completely inaccurate; facts were misleading
RESEARCH	Went above and beyond to research information; used material in addition to what was provided, more than 3 sources included	Did a very good job of researching; used materials to potential; 3 sources included	Used the material provided in an appropriate manner but did not consult additional resources; less than 3 sources included.	Did not use resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the topic; less than 3 sources included
CREATIVITY	Presentation was creative and original; unique approach enhanced presentation.	Presentation, at times, showed creativity and originality	Presentation included some creativity and originality	Presentation lacked creativity and originality;
PRESENTATION MECHANICS	Presentation engaged the audience from the beginning and maintained their attention throughout; used a variety of visual aids/multi-media which were colourful and clear	Presentation maintained audience attention; aids/multi-media were included.	Presentation was, at times, engaging; limited or inappropriate use of visual aids/multi-media, which did little to enhance presentation	Presentation did not engage or maintain audience attention; did not use visual aids/multi-media.
GROUP PARTICIPATION	All students participated enthusiastically.	Most of the students participated enthusiastically.	Half of the group actively participated.	Only 1 or 2 people participated.
SHARED RESPONSIBILITY	Responsibility for the task was shared evenly; group members were assigned roles/tasks.	Responsibility for the task was shared by most of the group; roles/tasks were assigned but not adhered to.	Responsibility for the task was shared by half of the group; roles/tasks were assigned but not undertaken.	Responsibility for the task was left to one person; roles/tasks not assigned
GROUP INTERACTION	Students expressed their views and listened to others within the group; demonstrated an awareness of others’ opinions in discussions.	Students expressed their views and listened to others within group, discussing task-oriented topics.	Students expressed their views; attempted to discuss task-oriented topics.	Little group interaction on task-oriented topics.

This page is Bobby Approved.



Introduction	Task	Process	Resources	Evaluation	Conclusion