|
|
PROFICIENT |
CONSOLIDATING |
DEVELOPING |
BEGINNING |
|
ORGANIZATION |
Presentation
well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; Flowed smoothly
from one idea to another.
Written
notes show evidence that |
Presented
in thoughtful manner; signs of organization.
Written notes show beginnings of accuracy and organization. |
Somewhat
organized; ideas not presented coherently. Written notes are sketchy. |
Choppy
and confusing; format difficult to follow No evidence of written notes. |
|
CONTENT
ACCURACY |
Completely
accurate; all facts were precise and explicit.
|
Mostly
accurate, a few inconsistencies |
Somewhat
accurate; more than a few inconsistencies or errors in information |
Completely
inaccurate; facts were misleading |
|
RESEARCH |
Went
above and beyond to research information; used material in addition to
what was provided, more than 3 countries included
|
Did
a very good job of researching; used materials to potential; 3 countries
included |
Used
the material provided in an appropriate manner but did not consult
additional resources; less than 3 countries included. |
Did
not use resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the
topic; less than 3 countries included |
|
CREATIVITY |
Presentation
was creative and original; unique approach enhanced presentation. |
Presentation,
at times, showed creativity and originality |
Presentation
included some creativity and originality |
Presentation
lacked creativity and originality; |
|
PRESENTATION
MECHANICS |
Presentation
engaged the audience from the beginning and maintained their attention
throughout; used a variety of visual aids/multi-media which were colourful
and clear |
Presentation
maintained audience attention; aids/multi-media were included. |
Presentation
was, at times, engaging; limited or inappropriate use of visual
aids/multi-media, which did little to enhance presentation |
Presentation
did not engage or maintain audience attention; did not use visual
aids/multi-media. |
|
GROUP
PARTICIPATION
|
All
students participated enthusiastically. |
Most
of the students participated enthusiastically. |
Half
of the group actively participated. |
Only
1 or 2 people participated. |
|
SHARED
RESPONSIBILITY |
Responsibility
for the task was shared evenly; group members were assigned roles/tasks. |
Responsibility
for the task was shared by most of the group; roles/tasks were assigned
but not adhered to. |
Responsibility
for the task was shared by half of the group; roles/tasks were assigned
but not undertaken. |
Responsibility
for the task was left to one person; roles/tasks not assigned |
|
GROUP
INTERACTION |
Students
expressed their views and listened to others within the group;
demonstrated an awareness of others’ opinions in discussions. |
Students
expressed their views and listened to others within group, discussing
task-oriented topics. |
Students
expressed their views; attempted to discuss task-oriented topics. |
Little
group interaction on task-oriented topics.
|
